Mistry’s firms move NCLAT
On March 6, the NCLT had ruled against the maintainability of the petition filed against Tata Sons, which cited governance lapses and compromise of minority shareholder interests after Mistry was ousted as Chairman of the holding company of the industrial conglomerate.
On March 6, NCLT held that Mistry’s family firms were not qualified to file a petition against Tata Sons alleging mismanagement and oppression of minority shareholders.
Under the current rules, only a shareholder with more than 10 per cent effective shareholding can file a minority interest petition with the NCLT.
However, the Companies Act empowers the NCLT to waive off this requirement for a petitioner to hold at least 10 per cent of the total issued share capital of the company to qualify for filing a minority interest petition.
On April 17, the NCLT had dismissed a plea filed by Mistry’s investment companies to waive off a regulatory bar on them as their original petition had been rendered non-maintainable by the March 6th order.
Besides the waiver plea, the main company petition which was filed against Tata Sons was also rejected on April 17.
On October 24 last year, Tata Sons’ Board ousted Mistry as its Chairman and appointed Ratan Tata as Interim Chairman.